Refouled by Sweden.

For me the issue of refoulement is very personal. It has faces and names. 

Inclusive my late fiancee; a total of four out of seven close asylum seeker friends (adopted family at this point), whom I met at the Migrant camps in Vintergatan, Säffle (2001 & 2008) and in Deje (2013) were refouled by Sweden with disastrous consequences. 

At the Swedish migrant camps people shed their nationality derived personna. Internees do not see themselves as (for example) *Syrian*, *Afghan* or *Ukrainian* or *Chinese*; as a matter of individual survival and collective self preservation, the situation quickly forces on them into a new collective tribal identity: asylsökande. Diverse versions of accented *Broken English* is the lingua franca of this tribe. 

I call it *The Inverted Tower of Babel Effect*.

If someone wants to observe internationslist solidarity against a common adversary in action; all they have to do is visit a Swedish migrant camp (if these still exist in the mid-2020's), and watch how the interned migrants collaborate with each other and care for each other: safety in numbers, because we all are in the same boat surviving against *them* (Migrationsverket och Granspolisen).

I lived in Sweden mostly in the Karlstad-Forshaga-Hammarö region of Värmland but also for short periods in Göteborg, Uppsala, Malmö and Halmstad. I was in Sweden from June 2001 to May 2005; then from January 2006 to May 2016, and finally from December 2016 to February 2024. In context, I also had short stints in Norway in 2005 & 2008 (Bergen), 2016 & 2022 (Trondheim). 

The following are the names of adopted family from Vintergatan and Deje who were refouled by Sweden during my time inside The Yellow Curtain (what I call the borders of Sweden). A roll-call of shame:

*Last names omitted in respect of asylum secrecy and anonymity*

Ysmael. From Turkey. We lived together in a migrant apartment in Vintergatan (Säffle) for about one year between July 2001 and September 2002. He was an army deserter. He sought asylum in Sweden. He was rejected and returned to Turkey in 2003 where he was subjected to violence by the military police upon arrival. In partnership with a civil war survivor from Bosnia, Ysmael managed to survive clandestinely in Göteborg for about 8 months after his second negative; until he was caught, incarcerated in the förvaret archipelago and then deported to Turkish  military police custody sometime in September 2003. Last I saw him he was boarding a bus to Göteborg in Säffle in October 2002. He told me he got his second nagative and had to get lost.  

Yusuf. My late fiancee. He had been involved with Arab Spring related protests in his city in North Africa in 2011. He sought asylum in Sweden in 2012. He was murdered as a direct result of refoulement carried out by the Swedish Border Police in October 2013. Yusuf migrated to Europe via Spain and France to Sweden in 2011. He was forcibly refouled to Tchad (Tašād) by the Swedish Border Police, a country he did not come from (from the detention center at Kållered he emailed me that he was hoping to be sent back to Spain because he entered the Schengen Zone there. That was the last communication I had from him). At the time he was refouled to Tchad (Tašād) the country was in the midst of civil conflict derived from the aftermath of the 2011 fall of Muammar al-Gaddafi in Lybia. Tchad (Tašād) had been a Lybian protectorate before 2011 and after the fall of Muammar al-Gaddafi the country imploded into violence. After Yusuf was deported there in October 2013 Yusuf attempted to leave Tchad via Sudan and then Egypt; as he was nearing the Sudanese border he was set upon a group of armed men and killed. Yusuf and I were planning to get married in March of 2014 at Lövnäskyrkan in Hammarö. He was detained by the Swedish Border Police in September 2013 and refouled in October 2013. Someone from an NGO found an address book on Yusuf's person and was kind enough to email his sister in Rabat about what happened. She emailed me to tell me in January 2014.

I last saw Yusuf the morning of September 5, 2013. We had planned to have dinner out that evening. I found out he had been detained when he contacted me from the förvaret a few days latter.

Guy. We met at the migrant camp in Deje in 2013, where I lived six months. He was from the Sahel region of Africa. Francophone. We became friends because we both lived with dwarfism. It was he who introduced me to Yusuf. About one month before I departed from the Deje camp he was taken by Swedish Granspolisen to the förvaret at Flen to be deported. He was a journalist; wanted in his country for writing newspaper articles critical of the government. With help from France, Sweden returned him. I learned later from an NGO contact we both had been associated with; that upon arrival at the airport, after being deported; he was seized by police, his baggage was confiscated and then brutally beaten. 

Orhan. From Kurdistan. We met in the spring of 2008 at Stadsmissionen in Karlstad when we were both homeless and papperslösa (*). We became close friends. Migrationsverket gave asylum to his son of five, but denied it to him. The socialen took his son from him directly from the daggis (daycare center) without notifying him. The police ruled he "smoked marijuana infront of the boy", an assertion that he denied. Custody of the boy was legally taken from him. His son was subsequently adopted by a childless Swedish couple, Orhan learned later. When he complained, he was told he should be "grateful his son would grow up in Sweden". Insult added to injury. Just after summer 2009, Orhan left Sweden for Germany. Last I heard from him was early 2010. Orhan was working washing dishes black somewhere in Leipzig. He was looking for his brother there. I never heard from Orhan again.

(*) I was homeless and papperslösa in Karlstad, Sweden between March 2008 and April 2011.

///

Not Refouled, but **F*cked Over Anyways***

Samir. He was not refouled, but run out of Sweden. A close friend from Iraq. He was supportive when I was in the streets. We met in Karlstad at a church in 2010. We became close friends after he learned I was papperslösa. He helped me when he could. They made his life a living hell at his work because he looked "Moslem" (they meant Arabic), even though he was an Iraqi Christian. He told me of several incidents of abuses and insults he had endured in Sweden since he arrived in 2006. He got in with the amnesty that year. He became fed up with Sweden and relocated to Canada sometime in 2011.

Juan C. From the Caribbean. We met in the migrant camp in Deje. We lived in the same room for six months. We became friends out of *cultural affinity* (maybe). After he got his second nagative; he immediately fled to Norway where his wife and child were waiting for him. Juan was wanted by the secret police in his native jurisdiction and had concrete evidence of it; but Sweden still said "no" to his application. He also presented his passport. He did all that was required of him and Sweden still said "no". The last time I saw him in Sweden was at the Karlstad bus station, I was with him while he waited for the bus to Oslo. I remember him saying he now understood why people lied when they applied for asylum in Sweden - because it does not matter if you show evidence of your identity or to back up your case. They still say *no* in order to just take people out of the system. 

Jorge R. From South America. A situation similar to Orhan, but involving a daughter. The socialen took custody of the girl and the Granspolisen deported the mother. Jorge attempted to kidnap his daughter back and then run to Spain. But it did not work. He was arrested by the Polisen, tried and sentenced to five years prison. His temporary permit was taken from him. He was deported in 2017.

///

I am a committed advocate for the abolition of walk-in asylum at the UN and EU levels; and its replacement with Vetted Quota Migration.

Walk-in asylum is a failed system that mostly creates anti-humanitarian outcomes for migrants at exhorbitant cost for citizen taxpayers. Only a small number of asylum applicants obtain a residence permit.

It is an expensive and failed system that murders people.

Vetted Quota Migration is the humane alternative to walk-in asylum.

Source of Interpol Documents cited in this Weblog (2023)

In the interest of transparency, this is the source of the documents presented. 

Information about the Migrationsverket worker who gave me the documents in context of a 2023 GDPR request at Åstorp has been redacted.

"Enshrined in Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention and reaffirmed in multiple subsequent declarations, non-refoulement prohibits any state from returning a person “to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened.” It is absolute and applies regardless of nationality, status or political expediency." 

Source of text: wsws.org

See also: 

http://asylemotsverige.blogspot.com/2023/12/evidence-that-american-police-is-lying.html

I would like to thank the following persons:

> The attorney who represented me during the extradition trial in Karlstad in 2007.  Not only did the court deny the extradition request; the court ruled that I be granted the Swedish residence permit. Migrationsverket and the Granspolisen refused to honor the ruling at the request of FBI and US State Department. I was placed on a no-fly list and banned from travel to the United States. The Granspolisen then engaged in a concerted effort to deport me to Venezuela under  identity information that was not my own and that actually belonged to a person with a similar name who has never traveled out of Venezuela.

> The attorneys from Nilssons Advocates in Katrineholm, Sweden who represented me in context of the 2007, 2012 and 2016 asylum applications. They got me released from detention and placed in supervision  in 2007, 2012 and 2020.

> The attorney who represented me in Malmö, Ystad and Åstorp in 2023. In order to spare him reprisals I decided to change attorneys right before I was released from Administrative Detention in August 2023. I only had a new attorney for one day, since Migrationsverket ruled I no longer had the right to legal representation. 

> The Migrationsverket worker in Örebro who showed me in February 2020 what the Interpol report associated with my biometrics said regarding criminal allegations. I became aware of the extent of the campaign of libel and character assasination I was being subjected to on Interpol. Because of the pandemic, I had to postpone taking action on the matter until 2023.

> The Migrationsverket worker at Åstorp who approved the GDPR request for the Interpol report associated with my biometrics in 2023.

> The Migrationsverket worker at Åstorp who ruled I be released from administrative detention (förvaret) in August 2023. I spoke to him the day I was released as I waited outside the Åstorp detention facility to be picked up by a friend. He wrote that he ruled I be released in order to "restore proportionality to the situation". 

Mvh

Andres Nicolas Moran

(Miguel Angel Torres)

Swedish Police deliberately misrepresented the criminal complaint I filed against INTERPOL

In order to sabotage my efforts and protect their Interpol and American counterparts and also to stall my case until the records could be sanitized to delete anything that could corroborate my side of it; Swedish Police deliberately misrepresented the facts of the criminal complaint I filed. The Police resorted to the usual tactic of mispelling my name (The Migration Board and Border Police did the same on my asylum applications since 2012). They do this deliberately as a form of psychological harassment and also to trivialize the complaint.  

___

Re: polisanmälan.
Good morning,

The present missive is to inform you that I have received postal correspondence on March 1, 2023 at the Migrationsverket detention center at Åstorp that my complaint against Migrationsverket, Swedish Border Police, Sweden Interpol in Stockholm, United States Homeland Security Department, and United States Interpol in Washington for aggravated defamation and other irregularities has been noted by PKC-grupp 1 Rgn Bergslagen and is being processed.

I had some questions and was told to call 114 14. I was finally able to speak with someone at the Police yesterday. First of all I pointed out that the name under which the complaint was registered had been misspelled: "AMiguel Angel Toores". I told the person I spoke to at 114 14 that the correct spelling of the first name was "Miguel". The person told me that he would email the department in charge of the complaint about this and that they would contact me. I also gave them my current phone number: 073***2603. I never received the promised feedback. 

I also had questions about whether my complaint was understood correctly. In the postal correspondence from the police it says that "Miguel vill anmäla svenska polisen och USA för tjänstfel". I am not complaining against "Swedish Police" or "The United States" in general, I am, in a very specific manner, complaining against: Migratiosnverket, Swedish Border Police, NCB INTERPOL Stockholm (directly) and NCB INTERPOL Washington, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (indirectly).

The person to whom I spoke said he would communicate my concerns to the department handling my complaint and that they would contact me. This never happened. 

To clarify:

(1) I complained specifically about being subjected to aggravated defamation, to violation of human rights guaranteed in the EU convention and finally violation of my right to secrecy in context of asylum proceedings. Very specifically; I cited Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU says: "Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. Respect for the rights of the defense of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed". I complained that defamatory and false information was being used as pretext to violate the human rights standard of presumption of innocence, to which I am entitled to.

(2) In my complaint I specifically cited Article 1 of Chapter 5 of the Swedish Penal Code. In it defamation is defined as a person being pointed out as someone being a criminal, or as having a reprehensible way of living or otherwise furnishes information intended to cause exposure to the disrespect of others. Defamation is further defined as the communication of information to a third party that is designed to expose a person to the disrespect of others. It is not necessary to prove that the defamatory statement had any particular effect."

My biometric data (fingerprints) have been associated by INTERPOL actors with full collusion by Swedish Border Police to a number of very serious and defamatory criminal allegations, without my knowledge and without any evidence; (1) that I perpetrated aggravated assult on a child in the United States, (2) that I stole 10,000 Euros in France, (3) that I was involved in the smuggling of narcotics from the Netherlands to Germany in 2000. I have never committed these alleged crimes. I have never been prosecuted or tried for the alleged offences before any court. These defamatory claims are presented by INTERPOL actors and the Swedish Border Police as "facts" in the public files associated with my bio metric fingerprint data and have been regarded as such by other authorities. This is a violation of my right to presumption of innocence. Using the pretext that I am allegedly a "criminal conman"; and in context of trying to determine my identity for purposes of deportation, the NCB INTERPOL Stockholm has shared confidential information about me and my case with actors that have that have no jurisdiction or reason to be involved in my asylum case like Germany, The United States Homeland Security Department and Colombia; thus violating my right to confidentiality as an asylum applicant. All of this was done without my consent. In addition there is a concerted effort to try to forcibly, deliberately and artificially associate my bio-metric information (fingerprints) with names of people in other countries that I am not.

Apparently, Migrationsverket, The Swedish Border Police and Sweden Interpol entitle themselves to associate bio metric information to names and birth-dates without any type of credible evidence processing and without the consent of the subject. The evidence process needs to take into account that Police actors from The United States and Sweden have planted false information on the record and deliberately and arbitrarily associated these inaccuracies with my bio metric information. This fact is demonstrable by looking at the mass of incoherent, inaccurate, contradictory and defamatory information contained in the INTERPOL reports being circulated about in association with my biometric information (fingerprints).

Thank you for your attention,

[Redcated]

a.k.a "Miguel Angel Toores"

(Andres Nicolas Moran) 

Migrationsverket beteckningsnummer: 121***09

Sweden has THE GALL to call Macron "repressive" !

In an article published in the World Socialist Website about the violent repression against workers, students and ordinary citizens in France during the mass protests that erupted on May 1 against the so-called "pension reform" imposed by President Macron, the authors informed about the following:

"At the UN Human Rights Council, Sweden called on France to “take measures to, in a transparent manner, address allegations regarding excessive use of force by police and gendarmerie against protesters during demonstrations.” 

Macron is an ASSH*OLE and his regime should be taken down by a workers revolutionary general strike, but Sweden is in no position to lecture Macron on "excessive use of force by police". 

I have written elsewhere that: The Swedish Security Police (Säkerhetspolisen) enforces a system of surveillance and repression of persons deemed a "threat" to the security of the Swedish State or the interests of the Swedish State. Historically, the radical left has been a constant target for repression and other abuses for its perceived "lack of loyalty" to the Swedish political-economy. Persons are arbitrarily declared "threats to security" at the whim of the Säkerhetspolisen without basis in any type of objective and impartial procedural evidentiary process. In April 2023, the Swedish government increased the budget for the security police (Säkerhetspolisen or SÄPO); which also functions as the political police force of the Swedish State, thus increasing the scope and intensity of potential repression against those deemed "disloyal" or "security threats" at the subjective whim of Säkerhetspolisen operatives.

In 2023, under the pretext that there exists an "immigrant crime wave" (in itself an overt anti migrant generalization promoted in the Swedish State and corporate "free press" media); there is the systematic violation and negation of presumption of innocence for persons with migrant backgrounds in the Swedish court system through the systematic abuse of the "flight risk" loophole by prosecutors and Police. Migrants (especially those of an African and/or Arabic background) are regularly harassed, arrested, imprisoned and sentenced on arbitrary grounds by private security guards, Police, prosecutors, and courts in Sweden. The evidence is in the overpopulated Swedish prisons, jails and detention centers which are filled with inmates of an immigrant background (mostly Arabic / Middle Eastern).

The Swedish State does not address allegations of abuses by Swedish Police when they are presented by migrants, in fact there is no impartial process whereby a person (of any background), who has been abused by Swedish Police can have their grievances independently and impartially considered. In Sweden allegations of abuse against the Police are investigated....by the Police. (!)

Good luck with your complaints of "excessive use of force by police" or any other type of Police abuse if you find yourself inside the police state SH*THOLE svenska samhället.

Misiva Enviada al Consulado de Cuba en Estocolmo sobre abusos de la Policia Sueca contra mi persona.

Denuncias oficiales de abusos por motivos políticos, religiosos y de genero de la policía sueca contra mí.

Esta misiva se envió al que tramita las denuncias por discriminación en Suecia, el DO:

Tras la recepción de la misiva, el DO le asignó el número de caso: Diarienummer: DO 20**/**21.

La Cruz Roja registró mi caso como: ärendenummer: 24***0. Svenska Röda Korset Vårdförmedlingen:  ärendenummer 4**2. El 9 de Mayo; Amnesty International envio la misiva a IAR, Individuos en riesgo.

Texto de la Misiva:

Una traducción al español de esta misiva está siendo enviada al Consulado de la República de Cuba. Se envía copia de esta carta al abogado designado por la policía para representarme. También se envía copia de esta carta a Amnistía Internacional y a la Cruz Roja, ya que en ocasiones visitan a los internos del centro de detención/centro de detención de inmigrantes de Åstorp. He presentado dos denuncias formales ante la policía: una en la que reclamo una indemnización por detención ilegal en enero de 2023, que forma parte de un recurso (Överklagar till hovrätten / B ***-**) [mi abogado dijo que tengo que mantener este recurso confidencial] y una segunda en la que se nombra a la Policía de Fronteras de Suecia, a la OCN de INTERPOL Estocolmo (directamente) y a la OCN de INTERPOL Washington, Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de Estados Unidos (indirectamente) por complicidad en difamación y libelo grave contra mí. (Fecha de la notificación: 2023-02-24. Unidad: PKC grupo 1 Rgn Bergslagen. Número de expediente: 5000-K224843-23) (A menos que los registros hayan sido modificados o borrados: Estados Unidos INTERPOL. Ref: 20120621589/DHE Asunto: IP-2020-008406 y NBC INTERPOL Estocolmo Asunto: IP-2020-008406). En ambos casos he mencionado las leyes concretas que considero que se han infringido en la tramitación de mi caso. He presentado quejas con anterioridad, pero no se ha hecho nada al respecto.

También he presentado denuncias por violación de mi derecho a la presunción de inocencia, garantizado por los convenios de la UE y la ONU.

Creo que esto se debe a la discriminación de la que he sido objeto por mi afiliación política y religiosa y mi identidad de género, así como a una campaña sistemática de difamación, libelo y calumnias que las autoridades policiales de Estados Unidos, Alemania y Suecia han estado llevando a cabo contra mí a través de Interpol y que también constan en los registros públicos Suecos desde al menos 2007. Estos agentes de policía fabrican a sabiendas mentiras de crimenes sobre mí y luego vinculan las mentiras de criminalidad que fabrican sobre mí con mis datos biométricos que figuran en los registros públicos, con total impunidad y sin recurrir a ningún tipo de procedimiento probatorio o evidencias. Dicen que soy un "estafador" , un "delincuente" , que soy un "enfermo mental", que no tengo credibilidad, etc. Esta difamación sistemática tiene por objeto desestimar de antemano mis denuncias sobre abusos.

Don las autoridades estadounidenses y suecas la que carece de credibilidad. La información sobre criminalidad y los juicios al respecto que figuran en los registros policiales/de inmigración y otros registros públicos suecos sobre mí no se basan en ningún tipo de prueba. He presentado denuncias ante la Autoridad de Protección de la Integridad (IMY) (número de registro IMY-2023-2804) y ante el Departamento Operativo Nacional /Sección de Análisis de la Información/Unidad Administrativa de la Agencia Sueca de Migración y se niegan a hacer nada al respecto.

La Autoridad Sueca de Protección de la Integridad (IMY), en su respuesta a mis quejas, reconoce en principio que la policía sueca está subordinada a la policía estadounidense: "Antes de compartir los datos, las autoridades suecas deben tener en cuenta la legislación pertinente en materia de confidencialidad, por ejemplo, el capítulo 21, sección 5 de la Ley de Acceso Público a la Información y Secreto, que establece que 5 de la Ley de Acceso Público a la Información y Secreto, que establece que la confidencialidad se aplica a la información sobre un ciudadano extranjero si cabe suponer que la divulgación de la información entrañaría un riesgo de abuso u otro perjuicio grave. Estados Unidos no suele considerarse un país de este tipo". Según admiten ellos mismos, no puedo esperar que la policía de fronteras sueca y otras autoridades me traten con imparcialidad en una posible disputa con Estados Unidos, ya que se ponen automáticamente de su parte por servilismo.

La denuncia:

He sido maltratado por la policía Sueca en su legitimación sistematica (sin pruebas) de calumnias y libelo contra mi provenientes de la policía y autoridades de EEUU y Alemanas. Y ello a pesar de que un tribunal Sueco en la ciudad de Karlstad rechazó en otoño de 2007 una petición de extradición de la policía estadounidense por falta de pruebas. La policía sueca me considera y me ha tratado como un delincuente sólo porque lo dice la policia de Estados Unidos durante los últimos 16 años. Debido a este prejuicio legitimado por la calumnia y la defamacion asi como prejuicios de tipo politico, mis solicitudes de asilo en Suecia en 2007, 2012 y 2016 nunca fueron examinadas seriamente y fueron rechazadas. Esto fue una forma de discriminación. Centrarse en la cuestión de mi identidad fue solo una excusa para no examinar nunca mis solicitudes de asilo propiamente. Desde 2015, mi identidad está legalmente establecida como Miguel Ángel Torres (en el sistema Sueco), ya que he estado usando ese nombre durante más de ocho años. Mi dignidad ha sido violada por la campaña de 16 años de difamación, calumnia, libelo y abusos llevada a cabo por las autoridades Suecas en connivencia con autoridades estadounidenses.

La principal razón por la que me enfrento actualmente a la discriminación es mi historial de activismo clandestino contra la deportación entre 2014 y 2018 y mi participación en la izquierda revolucionaria en Suecia desde noviembre de 2020 [y tambien en 2011-13] . Actualmente soy miembro (en el exilio) del Partido Comunista de Suecia (skp.se).

La policía en Suecia es un actor político de derechas y no la autoridad imparcial que dice ser. Esto fue evidente durante la campaña electoral de 2022, con políticos del Partido Moderado, los racistas Demócratas Suecos y otros partidos de derechas que se sumaron  a la politización de a la policía, animando a la policía a tener un comportamiento represivo y abusivo hacia los inmigrantes y otros grupos marginados de la sociedad, como las personas sin hogar (hemlösa). El hecho de que la policía Sueca esté asociada a la perspectiva política de la derecha y actúe como el brazo paramilitar políticamente del actual gobierno de extrema derecha significa que la policia Sueca no es un actor imparcial cuando trata con una persona como yo, que tiene un historial de activismo clandestino contra la deportación y que es miembro del Partido Comunista. El hecho de que ninguna de mis denuncias de abusos por parte de la policía sueca se investigue de forma imparcial e independiente demuestra que la situación está amañada (rigged) en mi contra, tanto por ser inmigrante como por ser miembro del Partido Comunista. 

Entre la primavera de 2014 y el verano de 2018, me organicé en una red clandestina de activistas voluntarios formada por miembros de diferentes comunidades cristianas de Suecia. Participábamos en las acciones de la red, no como miembros de iglesias concretas, sino como individuos voluntarios. Durante los cuatro años que estuve organizado en esta red clandestina, escondí a nueve personas en mi cabaña en  Hammarö (Värmland): un ugandés, un congoleño, dos marroquíes, cuatro afganos y un georgiano. Dos de los afganos eran adolescentes de 18 y 19 años que iban a ser deportados a una zona de guerra de la que no procedían.  Los dos marroquíes eran conversos del islam al cristianismo y corrían el riesgo de sufrir graves represalias por su apostasía si eran devueltos.  El georgiano era un disidente político que denunciaba la connivencia en la corrupción entre empresarios alemanes y el gobierno georgiano, pero como Georgia es un aliado occidental, Suecia rechazó su solicitud de asilo y fue amenazado con la expulsión y refoulement. Los ugandeses y los congoleños eran transexuales. Mis valores religiosos me obligaron a emprender acciones directas contra las detenciones y expulsiones que pudieran dar lugar a refoulement. Lo veíamos como una forma de resistencia directa contra las políticas de inmigración racistas y anticristianas del Estado Sueco. La cabaña que utilicé para esconder a las personas en riesgo de refoulement pertenecía a Lövnäskyrkan (parte de la congregación de la Iglesia Equmenia) en Hammarö. Como la Iglesia Equmenia adopta una postura firme contra el refoulement y en defensa de los derechos de los solicitantes de asilo y los indocumentados, esta confesión ha sido declarada "secta" por las autoridades suecas (*). Esto es claramente discriminatorio y prejuicioso.

(https://www.sandaren.se/nyhet/equmeniakyrkan-ar-en-sekt-enligt-migrationsverket) (*)

Entre Noviembre de 2021 y Marzo de 2022 estaba organizado con los Estudiantes Marxistas. Desde Abril de  2022 he participado activamente en el movimiento anti-OTAN y en la campaña electoral de del Partido Comunista de Suecia (skp.se). Esto me convierte en un enemigo político abierto del actual gobierno Sueco y de la policía que colabora con este en la implementacion de una agenda de "ley y orden"  de la derecha.

Debido a su historial de prejuicios, complicidad en graves difamaciones contra mi persona y parcialidad política afin; las autoridades policiales Suecas no pueden considerarse imparciales a la hora de tomar decisiones sobre mi caso, emitir juicios sobre mí, editar registros públicos relacionados con mi información biométrica o tomar decisiones sobre detenciones.

En cuanto a mí, soy un preso político en el centro de detención/centro de detención de inmigrantes de Åstrop. Soy rehén de una policía sueca hostil.

También me preocupa que pueda sufrir discriminación por ser no binario (non binary). Hasta 2021 no se concedió asilo a un transexual en Suecia, y fue el resultado de un recurso ante un tribunal. Las autoridades suecas tienen un historial de hostilidad y refoulement hacia las personas transexuales. En 2012, por ejemplo, Suecia expulsó a personas transexuales a la Rusia de Putin. Ya he mencionado el caso de los dos transexuales africanos a los que ayudamos en la Red de Activistas Cristianos. El Estado sueco no reconoce la existencia de personas no binarias, por lo que oficialmente mi humanidad se ve disminuida y negada. 

[Nota Editorial: El autor (Andres Nicolas Moran) , se considera persona sin genero (ieL) desde Septiembre del 2024). El autor dejo de identificarse como no binario.]

Gracias por su atención,

Jaime Varela Torres

a.k.a "Miguel Angel Toores"

(Andres Nicolas Moran) 

My Asylum Applications with Sweden in 2007, 2012 and 2016 were unjustly denied for political reasons.

In December 2016 applied for protection as an LGBTQi+ person. It was my fourth application for protection with Sweden as an LGBTQi person since 2001, 2006/7 & 2012. 

Complaint Filed by Andres Nicolas Moran in 2023 with UNHCR about abuses I endured in the Swedish Migrant processing and legal system >>>

Complaint Brief to UNHCR

(The Brief was filed under the alias Jaime Varela Torres for fear of provoking retaliation against people I care about bacl in Florida. In 2005, the FBI forced one such a person to sign statements under duress in support of criminal allegations attributed to my person fabricated by them.)

 This picture was taken on March 20,     2003 at Sol Torget in Karlstad, Sweden. 

 I published it on Facebook in 2023. 

In 2006/2007 I had also applied for protection as a political activist involved with the movement against the war in Iraq and with No Human is Illegal. In the 2006 Swedish election I volunteered to work with the electoral campaign of a left socialist political party. An article I wrote was publised in their newspaper. 

The person depicted delivering a speech in 2003 in this picture, was as of the 2022 Swedish election a prominent Green Party politician in Karlstad, Sweden. 

See also: March 20, 2003 Sol Torget, Karlstad. Värmland mot Krig och Terrorism.

      March 20, 2003 Sol Torget, Karlstad. 

The above was used against me by Migrationsverket and the Moderate led government of Sweden that came to power in 2006. Under the excuse that I was an alleged "terrorism threat"; in 2007 the Bush Administration State Department placed me on a no-fly list, banned my entry into the United States and invalidated my passport and social security number. Henceforth, The United Statesand Sweden proceeded to engage in a decade long systematic campaign of libel and character assasination against me on the Interpol system. 

Sweden was instructed by the Bush Administration State Department to never grant me asylum or protection no matter what. In context of that, as of 2020, my biometrics were associated by US Homeland Security with identity information belonging to people from countries I am not from and with alleged crimes in the United States, France and Germany that I had nothing to do with. 

By 2016, the name Miguel Angel Torres was legally established in Sweden because I had used it consistently for 9 years since 2007. However, Migrationsverket claimed that I applied for asylum under another name in 2007, a lie that the Border Police continues to uphold. Migrationsverket and the Border Police deleted all the records of my case from 2007. Briefs filed by my attorney objecting in appeal to the imposition of the name the United States government alleged was mine on the application and the subsequent court decision that the Border Police had no right to impose the name the Inited States wanted to impose; because it lacked basis in evidence, were erased. 

In early 2020 I was released from the Förvaret at Flen by the court (a last toehold of legal justice in a by then corrupted post democratic court system), because during 2012-2013 I attended supervision for one year and a half without failing to deliver the required signature one single time. The Border Police and Migrationsverket deleted these facts from the record in order to paint me as a "flight risk", discredit and vilify me to  justify an arbitrary period of long detention at Åstorp where towards the end I underwent severe anxiety due to being forced to stay in a homophobic environment.  The intention of the Border Police was to "break me"; but it did not work. The long arbitrary detention period only made me more resolute and determined to defend myself against abuses. 

In Sweden (as in Macron's France and Biden's Junta USA) State authorities demand blind respect while hiding human and civil rights abuses behind talk of "rule of law"  and granting themselves immunity from responsibility for their abuses through the conjure of an abstract and extremist interpretation of "sovereignty"... 

Ref. 

Statslos Papperslos och Rattslos i Sverige: mitt liv som flykting

*I was forced to live as an undocumented LGBTQi migrant from Florida, USA not a refugee in the sense of scaping war... 

I ceased to be undocumented in 2024.

Miguel Angel Torres

(Andres Nicolas Moran) 

 

Evidence that United States Interpol LIED about my identity in 2020, 2023.

There is a concerted effort to associate my biomeric information with that of a person in Venezuela who has a similar name but a different birth date and who has never been issued a Venezuelan passport and has never traveled out of  that country. 

My birth name is Andres Nicolas Moran, not "Andres Nicolas Moron Ponce" and I was born in Florida in March 1975, not at Venezuela in "1973".

I can safely and publicly state these facts because I am now safe from the possibility of refoulment.

Reference: 

Servicio Administrativo de Identificación, Migración y Extranjería (Saime)

About Fabricated Allegations connecting Me to Venezuela or Mexico.

Good Afternoon,

Background: On the 30th of June 2023 I sent a statement by email to Migrationsverket at Åstorp and copied it to my attorney titled "Beteckningsnummer: 1******9 / The Reason I will not meet with or talk with Border Police". On July 26th I sent a statement by email to Migrationsverket at Åstorp and copied to my attorney titled "July 31, 2023 Statement". The present is a follow up to the previously cited and includes my detailed reply to claims that I am allegedly from "Venezuela" or "Mexico". I want the following statement to be added to the record (beteckningsnummer: 1******9). IN VERBATIM. IN ENGLISH. An English copy and a translation into Spanish have been forwarded to the Justice Ministry of the Republic of Cuba.

Information about my identity sourced to United States Interpol in 2023 is not accurate. (1) I have been subjected to a systematic and longstanding campaign of libel and defamation conducted against me on the Interpol system since 2007 with full collusion of Swedish Interpol and migrationsverket (in violation of the Swedish law against defamation). (2) The Swedish Border Police take false allegations about my identity made in context of Interpol (recycled by Customs and Border Protection), as "factual"  without demanding to see concrete evidence to back up the allegations.

 

Under the circumstances, only a State of Florida issued certificate of birth could be construed as concrete and incontrovertible evidence of my identity.

Information about me in United States Interpol reports from 2020 and 2023 is contradictory and incoherent. My bio metric information is apparently being linked to a number of different persons with similar names. 

(Source: Report from United States INTERPOL, Ref: 20120621589/DHE Subject: IP-2020-008406).  

*** In case the Interpol records related to inquiries into my identity made since 2016 by Swedish Interpol have been redacted or altered in any way; I have taken screenshots of all these documents as they stood on February 2023 and had copies forwarded to The Cuban Justice Ministry. Cuba Interpol also has them.

*It is a fact that I resided in Florida from my birth there in March 1975 until I moved to Pennsylvania in October 1997 under the name Andres Nicolas Moran. 

The allegation from United States Interpol in 2020/23 that my name is allegedly  "Andres Nicolas Moron Ponce" and/or "Moron Ponce, Andres Nicolas" is a long standing recycled LIE that has been dismissed as having no basis in evidence at least in two occasions in Sweden: (a) In 2007 the allegation was made by the United States in context of an extradition proceeding before a court in Karlstad, Sweden. The court dismissed the allegation made by United States about my identity for lack of evidence. The court in Karlstad also denied the extradition request citing lack of evidence (video, photographic) about the criminal allegations made, credible danger of being subjected to re-foulement, as well as expiration of statue of limitations provisions. (2) In 2012 the Swedish Rikskriminalpolisen made an investigation into my identity based on bio metric data (fingerprints) collected from me using forensic methods specially for this purpose. The conclusion was that the nationality of "Moron Ponce, Andres Nicolas" born on "March 27, 1975" was "unknown". ***(See attached screenshot file to view the investigation conclusion). Nothing was found by the Rikskriminalpolisen associating the said name or my bio metrics to "1973".

Only the United States claims that my name is "Andres Nicolas Moron Ponce" and/or "Moron Ponce, Andres Nicolas" allegedly born in "1973" in "Venezuela". MY LAST NAME IS MORAN NOT "MORON PONCE" . The association between my bio metric information and innacurate identity data on their databases since 2007 has no basis in evidence.

The persistent effort by United States and Swedish Interpol to force the Venezuelans between 2016 and 2022 to produce an association of my bio metric data to the information they and the United States Interpol want it associated with was unsuccessful (see Venezuela Interpol reports above) . Now that the effort to associate me with Venezuela failed, they are trying to artificially associate me with Mexico, again without one shred of concrete evidence. 

[Redacted] 

Thank you.

mvh,

Miguel Angel Torres

[Andres Nicolas Moran] 

Migrationsverket and Swedish Gränspolisen deleted my 2007 case files and destroyed evidence to sanitize the record...

The 2007 Statement: Information the Swedish Border Police (Gränspolisen) and Migrationsverket want to suppress about my case. Migrationsverket deleted all the files related to the application for asylum I filed in 2007 in an effort to sanitize the record and destroy evidence that corrabrates my side of it as well as the fact that I was entitled to have the permit in 2007 but Migrationsverket refused to grant it at the request of the United States. Today the Gränspolisen chooses to pretend that my history in Sweden begins in 2012 when in fact it begun in 2001. This is a clear example of how Migrationsverket lies. 

____

Polisrapport om undersökningen av min identitet 2012

God morgon,

Jag tänkte att ni kanske ville titta på det här dokumentet. Jag fick det av min advokat 2012 när Rikskriminalpolisen gjorde en utredning om min identitet. Jag greps i juni 2012 av gränspolisen efter att socialen hade meddelat dem att en papperslös person hade ansökt om hjälp. De kom för att gripa mig i som var min officiella adress i 2012. 

Dokumentet bevisar att gränspolisen ljög i protokolet. Deras påstående att jag först sökte asyl 2012 är falskt. Jag sökte asyl i Sverige första gången den 10 juni 2001. I dokumentet nämns också att jag greps den 13 september 2007 eftersom jag var internationellt efterlyst. USA ville utlämna mig.  Utlämningsförhandlingarna ägde rum i domstolsbyggnaden i Karlstad. Domstolen dömde till min fördel mot USA och avslog begäran om utlämning i brist på bevis. Gränspolisen vill i dag radera denna historia från protokollet eftersom den desinformation och de lögner som sprids om mig av USA's Interpol, i fullt samförstånd med svenska Interpol, är en upprepning av samma påståenden som domstolen i Karlstad avvisade 2007. INTERPOL i Stockholm hävdar att amerikansk polis har "bekräftat att jag har begått brott" i det landet. Det är dessa brottsliga påståenden som domstolen i Karlstad inte fann några bevis för. Ingenting är nytt.

Gränspolisen anser att jag är en "kriminell con-man" (och mycket värre) på grund av förtal som sprids om mig på INTERPOL. Under denna förevändning fortsätter de sedan att kränka min rätt till asylhemlighet i strid med FN:s regler och min rätt till oskuldspresumtion i strid med EU:s garantier.

En annan viktig detalj i dokumentet är den korrekta stavningen av namnet Miguel Angel TORRES, med två "R". Efter att domstolen gett mig rätt i utlämningsärendet sattes jag i förvar på förvaret i Flen i slutet av september 2007. Där satt jag till december 2007. Jag fick veta att jag kunde söka asyl, vilket jag gjorde.   Gränspolisen och Migrationsverket stavade efternamnet felaktigt som "Toores" av illvilja och som en taktik för psykiska trakasserier. Under de senaste 16 åren har jag bett om att få rättelse av felstavningen och de vägrar, trots att de vet mycket väl att namnet stavas TORRES.

De strök också medvetet efternamnet för att rättfärdiga att de nekade mig det uppehållstillstånd jag hade rätt till 2007. 

Jag började inte arbeta på att skaffa födelsebevis när jag kontaktade det kubanska konsulatet om detta i 2016 och nu 2023. Eftersom Kuba och USA återupptog de diplomatiska förbindelserna 2016, kontaktade jag Kubansk konsulat för att se om de kunde hjälpa mig att få mitt amerikanska (Florida) födelsebevis i samband med att jag ansökte om politisk asyl med Kuba. 2024 stod det klart att detta inte skulle vara möjligt och fick rådet att söka skydd på annat håll.

Det är en lögn att jag inte har medverkat till att skapa en identitet. Vad jag vägrar att samarbeta med är försök att tvinga mig att acceptera identitetsuppgifter som tillhör andra människor i länder som jag inte kommer ifrån eller falska uppgifter som kommer från USA Interpol / Homeland Security i 2020, 2023. 

Jag har upprepade gånger påmint Migrationsverket och gränspolisen om att jag enligt FN:s regler har rätt att söka asyl utan ID-handlingar. Jag förstår att namnet Miguel Angel Torres redan är juridiskt etablerat som mitt namn eftersom jag har använt det i mer än åtta år i följd (totalt 16 år). Jag skulle kunna leva med detta namn om det stavades korrekt, som i det bifogade dokumentet.  

Tack för din uppmärksamhet,

Mvh,

"Miguel Angel Toores"

[Andres Nicolas Moran] 

 

The Collapse of My Human Rights Situation in Sweden in 2023.

Complaint Filed on 2023 with UNHCR by Andres Nicolas Moran about abuses he endured in the Swedish Migrant processing and legal system >>>

Complaint Brief to UNHCR

(The Brief was filed under the alias Jaime Varela Torres for fear of provoking retaliation against people I care about back in Florida. In 2005, the FBI forced one such a person to sign statements under duress in support of criminal allegations attributed to my person fabricated by them. This is why I wrote thst I hsd been an "undocumented migrant" in the United States, so as to deflect attention away from people I care about in Florida and shield them from possible retaliation. In all this I have to factor the possibility of collateral damage impacts upon innocent third parties there.)

I.

*** Article 5 (UNDHR): No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

(PODCAST)

In 2023 in Sweden I was subjected to a form of psychological torture while detained at the immigrant detention facility in Åstorp, Skåne. I had to undergo six long months of detention and that was a form of psychological torture itself because I live with anxiety disorder. I did receive medication for anxiety and depression at Åstorp; and because of that I was able to more or less cope. However, because of the homophobia of inmates who came from cultures where homosexuality and transexuality are not accepted I lived in fear of being assaulted and that created more anxiety. That background situation of insecurity aggravated the stress created by having to defend myself against the relentless efforts of the Swedish Border Police to refoul me. The Swedish Migration Board does not make provision for LGBTQi+ inmates at their detention facilities and fault for the problems is not with the migrants who come from cultures where homosexuality is forbidden.

I was subjected to degrading treatment in the context of proceedings related to being investigated on suspicion of a minor crime in Malmo in 2023. I was detained in a prison environment, and not a pre-trial detention facility, before being tried; in gross violation of the right to presumption of innocence and the prohibition of unlawful deprivation of liberty. The prosecutor and police engaged in this arbitrary behavior citing an alleged “flight risk” possibility that they did not back with any type of evidence. The panel that heard my appeal on detention was a panel of local Politicians and the prosecutor, not an impartial legal tribunal. That forum was clearly an illegitimate political rubberstamp proceeding lacking any type of judicial credibility. I was transported to and from the remand prison at Ystad in shackles as if I had been a terror or violent murder suspect. This overreach was clearly intended and calculated to be cruel and humiliating. A minor offense does not merit such degrading treatment. Then, after almost one month of being detained in a prison environment before being tried, in gross violation of my civil rights; I was subjected to additional public humiliation in the courtroom by the trial judges who insisted on publicly showing a video of me going to the bathroom. That was deliberate and calculated to humiliate me before everyone in that court. The prosecutor insisted the video be shown, so the public humiliation was part of her court strategy. The judges could have blurred out the parts that offended my dignity, so the act was calculated. I objected to the public showing of the video but the judge showed it anyway at the insistence of the prosecutor. This clearly demonstrates that the trial was rigged against me a priori.

II.

*** Article 10 (UNDHR): Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

(PODCAST)

In 2023 I filed a total of five appeals before tribunals in Sweden and none were properly reviewed. Three appeals concerned internment at the Migrationsverket detention facility at Åstorp, Skåne. The appeals against detention are not filed with the court but with the Border Police who then supposedly forward the appellation to the Migration appeals court if they do not agree to grant release. The problem is that in forwarding the appeals to the Migration appeals court; the Swedish Border Police redact the appellation text and only submit to the court a hacked and botched summary of the appeals. So the migration appeals court in reality never gets to review the substance of inmate appeals as they formulate it in their own words. This fraudulent appeals system is the reason why I was forced to endure six months of detention in a situation where I was in constant fear of a homophobic assault and why so many are refouled without recourse. Neither Migrationsverket nor the Swedish Border Police guarantee the physical safety of LGBTQi+ inmates while they are held hostage in the archipelago of detention centers operated by Migrationsverket. Asylum and detention appeals tribunals in Sweden are not independent or impartial forums (as they used to be up to about 2021), but rather entities engaged in the administration of rubber stamps on behalf of the Border Police and Migrationsverket.

III.

*** Article 11 (UNDHR): (1) Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense. (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offense on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offense, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offense was committed.

(PODCAST)

I was subjected to degrading treatment in the context of proceedings related to being investigated on suspicion of a minor crime in Malmö, Sweden in 2023. I was detained in a prison environment, and not a pre-trial detention facility, before being tried; in gross violation of the right to to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and the prohibition of unlawful deprivation of liberty. The prosecutor and police engaged in this arbitrary behavior citing an alleged “flight risk” possibility that they did not back with any type of evidence. The panel that heard my appeal on detention was a panel of local Politicians and the prosecutor, not an impartial legal tribunal. I was not given all the guarantees necessary for an aggressive defense in that context, since my objections to the arbitrariness of the proceeding were dismissed by the prosecutor as “irrelevant information”. That forum was clearly an illegitimate political rubberstamp proceeding lacking any type of judicial credibility. I was transported to and from the remand prison at Ystad in shackles as if I had been a terror or violent murder suspect. This overreach was clearly intended and calculated to be cruel and humiliating. A minor offense does not merit such degrading treatment.

Collusion between Sweden and the United States in defamation and libel against me on Interpol

I reproduce below the texts of the criminal complaints I filed with Swedish Police against Sweden INTERPOL, United States Homeland Security,and Swedish Border Police for collusion in aggravated defamation and libel against me with the intention of deliberate re-foulement.

In Sweden, complaints against Police are filed with Police (!!!). So; of course, the Police ruled it would not investigate the matter. No surprise there. There is no independent mechanism for private persons or migrants to report abuses by Police in Sweden. If you complain about Police abuse in Sweden;  the Police simply refuse to investigate and exonerate themselves. Even if you have evidence. This is specially true if the person complaining of abuses is a migrant. 

My bio metric information (fingerprints) are being associated to an incorrect name and birthday in order to make these fit to  criminal activity allegations concerning people with similar names.

mån 20 feb. 2023 • 11:35

Från: jaimevarela@***.com

Till Registrator <registrator@brottsoffermyndigheten.se>

Cc: Fraga <fraga@boj.se>,

Registrator Bergslagen <registrator.bergslagen@polisen.se>

Complaint against collusion in aggravated defamation against my person by Swedish Border Police and Migrationsverket. 

To whom it might concern,

The present missive constitutes a formal complaint of systematic and longstanding collusion in aggravated defamation against my person by Swedish Authorities.

I am a person whose nationality is classified as "unkown" (okänd) by Migrationsverket and whose identity, they claim, "cannot be verified". My position is that I have continuously utilized the name Miguel Angel Torres in Sweden for more than 8 years (2013-2023) and thus that name is established as my own. Migrationsverket refuses to recognize this. I have resided in Sweden and Norway since June 2001. I have never been granted a residence permit (uppehållstillstånd) in either country. Since June 2001 I have applied for asylum in Sweden in 2001, 2006/07, 2012 and 2016. Attempts to apply in Norway in 2005 and 2008 were rejected due to Schengen rules. All applications in Sweden have been rejected at the request of the United States. 

I claim that the name [Andres Nicolas Moran] is my original birth identity. A process is underway with the authorities of a Caribbean country to intermediate in obtaining my birth records on context of an application for political asylum. I am known to the Swedish Border Police under the name "Miguel Angel Toores". I have repeatedly told Migrationsverket that the last name is misspelled (the correct spelling is Torres) but they refuse to correct the mistake.  In the Swedish Migration Board asylum case database: "Miguel Angel Toores" / beteckningsnummer: 12***309. In the current Swedish Border Police case database: "Toores, Miguel Angel" Diarienummer A***.445/2*** // Dossiernummer (Migr): 12***309.

[Redacted]

In specific, I want to state what I consider that I have been subjected to a very damaging, longstanding and systematic campaign of violations by Migrationsverket and United States Homeland Security of Chapter 5, Article 1 of the Swedish law against Defamation & Libel and Chapter 4 of the Penal code that addresses violations on privacy; and finally, EU General Data Protection Regulation rules. I only became aware of the gravity and extent of the defamation in February of 2020 when I discussed the results of an INTERPOL inquiry into my identity (the fourth since 2007 by my count) conducted by the Swedish Migration Board, with a case worker at the agencies' office in the city of Örebro in Sweden.

Essence of my complaint: My bio-metric data (fingerprints) have been associated in the INTERPOL system with the full collusion of Migrationsverket and Sweden INTERPOL to a number of very serious and defamatory criminal allegations, without my knowledge, (1) that I allegedly perpetrated an aggravated assault in the United States in 1995, (2) that I allegedly stole 10,000 Euros in France in 1998, (3) that I was allegedly involved in the smuggling of narcotics from the Netherlands to Germany in 2000. These libelous and defamatory claims are presented by INTERPOL and the Swedish Border Police as "facts" in the public files associated with my bio-metric fingerprint data and have been treated as such by other authorities such as The Swedish Border Police. The United States claims they only have to say that they have "hard evidence" to back up the fabricated allegations and that they are not required to show it. The attitude of the United States is that "we don't have to prove anything". This vigilantism is accepted by Swedish Authorities as good coin under the excuse that they "have no reason to doubt the integrity of United States Authorities". In context of trying to determine my identity for purposes of deportation, the Swedish Migration Board has shared confidential information about my asylum applications with INTERPOL (which is controlled by the United States) and Germany, thus violating my right to confidentiality and asylum secrecy insofar as they have involved in my asylum case state actors that have no jurisdiction or reason to be involved in it. I applied for asylum and protection in Sweden, not The United States or Germany. 

In the Swedish Migration Board website it states that: "The transfer of personal data takes place in accordance with personal data or confidentiality legislation." This has been interpreted in my case to ignore UN rules guaranteeing my right to secrecy. I want to state a formal complaint that this rule has been systematically violated by the Swedish Border Police and Swedish Migration Board against my person, at least since 2007. The assessment of my character by Swedish Border Police and Swedish Migration Board (that I am a "con-man", "self important", "a fugitive criminal", "a rat", ad nauseam) is not objective, pejorative, malicious and abusive and compounds the gravity of their collusion in systematic defamation and abuses against my person for the last 16 years, which quite frankly constitutes a vendetta. INTERPOL HAS NO CREDIBILITY when it comes to disseminating information about my person or information associated with my bio-metric data. I have never been prosecuted for these these alleged offences before any court. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ME PERPETRATING ANY OF THOSE CRIMES. There is no video or photographic evidence showing me assaulting anyone in 1995 in the United States. Those allegations are based on hearsay and lies, probably motivated by an attempt to extort money from me. 

In 2007 there took place an extradition proceeding at the court in Karlstad, Sweden regarding allegations of "credit card fraud" (sic.) and other charges in the United States; but nothing could be proven and the request for extradition was denied. According to my attorney at the time, after being rebuffed; the United States Marshalls Service declared that I was not allowed entry in the United States for life. In reply to arguments by my attorney that conditions of imprisonment in the United States had been denounced by Human Rights organizations as degrading and permissive of torture; as in long periods of solitary confinement; the representative of the United States stated "we do not mollycoddle criminals"; in other words, the United States entitles itself to violate the human rights of incarcerated persons with impunity. While convicted incarcerated persons are legally denied their freedom, their entitlement to Human Rights remains inviolate. This is basic, universal human rights principle is not recognized in practiced by the United States. This fact was recognized by the court in Karlstad, Sweden in September 2007. In context of the aforementioned extradition proceedings; the U.S. State Department lied to the court stating that I "was NOT an American Citizen" (sic.), yet Migrationsverket and the Swedish Border Police insist in listing the United States as one of five countries I am supposed to be potentially deported to (besides Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela, and Cuba). 

In 2012 I was told by a Swedish Migration Board case worker while in detention (Förvaret) at their facilities in Flen, Sweden that "all criminal charges had been expunged from my record". In February 2020 I found out not only that I was lied to in 2012 by The Swedish Migration Board, but that the extent of the defamatory vendetta against me on Interpol was far more serious than I could have possibly imagined. I must give credit in that I found out these facts because of the kindness of the Swedish Migration Board case worker in Örebro, Sweden that was assigned my case; who in February 2020 was nice enough to show me the results of the inquiry made to INTERPOL in Washington, D.C. I was aghast when I read it. I did not take action at the time because I feared retaliation. But I am no longer afraid. I have realized that in not acting to complain, I perpetuate the defamation.

Conclusion: (1) I want my bio metric data (fingerprints) immediately disassociated from defamatory and libelous criminal allegations and I want independent third party verifiable evidence that this was done. (2) I want my bio metric data (fingerprints) to be disassociated form contradictory, incoherent and fabricated allegations about my name, birth date and nationality sourced to Swedish and United States INTERPOL. (3) I want positive action taken to repair (as far as possible) the damage that systematic defamation and libel against my person on INTERPOL and elsewhere has caused me.

Thank you for your attention,

[Andres Nicolas Moran]

a.k.a. "Miguel Angel Toores"

***

For the purposes of Police reporting (if applicable):

https://polisen.se/om-polisen/kontakt/region-bergslagen/

"Say what has happened without diminishing your own victimization. Say what you work with or are engaged in if you think that the victimization is related to this. Also tell if you feel unsafe and if you have been victimized before. State if you have any saved information that can be used as evidence, such as a screen dump or a text message."

My statement: Since 2020 I have been subjected to an illegal campaign of systematic and aggravated defamation by Migrationsverket in collusion with Sweden INTERPOL, United States INTERPOL and the United States Homeland Security Department (Chapter 5, Article 1 of the Swedish law against Defamation & Libel). This has caused serious damage to my reputation and credibility as a person before Swedish Authorities and others viewing the libelous lies about alleged crimes I never committed and that have been deliberately associated with my bio-metric information on INTERPOL dossiers. I feel very unsafe. I fear that I might be subjected to refoulement by Swedish Border Police and afterwards subjected to severe abuses by the United States Government (which controls INTERPOL). I want my human rights situation monitored. I have been vilified and demonized without me knowing about it for several years. I was lied to by Swedish Migration Board case workers in Flen, Sweden who told me that all criminal charges against me from the extradition proceeding in 2007 had been expunged. The evidence is in the INTERPOL report returnedin 2020 after The Swedish Migration Board received a reply to their inquiry about my identity for deportation purposes in late 2019/early 2020, no doubt the Swedish Migration Board shared with INTERPOL confidential information about my application, thus violating purported secrecy rules and exposing me to refoulement.

Radio Free Migrant (R-FM) No. 1

In this R-FM mini-podcast we discuss the recent press release by the Swedish Justice Ministry about the net emigration trend on 2023-2024.

PODCAST TRANSCRIPT

-----

Sweden government / Justice Ministry

(regering.se/)

More emigrants than immigrate to Sweden for the first time in over 50 years >>>

(Asylum approvals declined by 16% in 2024 compared to 2023.)

***Write-up published on the government website on August 8, 2024.

"Last year's trend of a reduced number of asylum seekers to Sweden and a reduced number of granted residence permits continues. According to the Migration Agency's forecast, Sweden looks set to receive the lowest number of asylum seekers since 1997, and for the first time in over 50 years, Sweden has net emigration."

------

RADIO FÖRVARET  (***Blocked by META unless you log into Facebook***) 

UNDOCUMENTED SURVIVALISM 

Swedish Police are a Repressive Political Entity. (Reboot)

The duplicity of the political government of the Swedish State is illustrated in its denunciations of police repression in Nicaragua. The government of Nicaragua does not need me to defend it and that is not my purpose here. My only intention is to illustrate yet another example of the hypocrisy of the political government of the Swedish State in matters of Human Rights.

According to a write up regarding a EU resolution about Nicaragua the Swedish State Regeringslansliet stated in 2023:

"The already serious situation in Nicaragua has continued to deteriorate in recent years with regard to democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights. On 21 January 2019, the Council of the European Union adopted conclusions strongly condemning the repression of the press and civil society and the use of anti-terrorist laws to suppress dissent in Nicaragua. The Council stressed that demonstrations since April 2018 have been brutally suppressed by security forces and pro-government armed groups, resulting in several hundred deaths and injuries and the arrest of hundreds of citizens, characterized by widespread irregularities and arbitrariness in detention and judicial proceedings. The Council recalled the need to ensure accountability for all crimes committed since April 2018, regardless of who committed them. The Council also called on the Government of Nicaragua to resume a meaningful and results-oriented dialogue, including on the adoption of electoral reforms."

As it concerns "rule of law and respect for Human Rights"; allegedly that situation in a democracy requires that the police be apolitical. The Police in Sweden are a political actor, and not the impartial public authority it claims to be:

Politicians from the Moderate and Christian Democrat parties mollycoddle the Police and that emboldens the Police to engage in repressive and abusive behaviour towards migrants and other marginalized social groups, such as the Swedish homeless or Romanian Romer. After the 2022 election, Swedish Police have openly become the informal paramilitary wing of the neoconservative Moderate party. A situation analogous to the relationship that existed between the ZANU-PF militia and the Mugabe regime in Zimbabwe.

As I wrote elsewhere in this weblog: The "flight risk" loophole is the universal excuse that Swedish Police use to negate the Human Right to presumption of innocence to persons of a migrant background. Swedish jails, prisons and detention centers are currently overfilled with migrant inmates whose Human Right to presumption of innocence has been collectively and systematically violated under the said pretext. I was interned at the remand prison at Ystad, Skåne for three weeks in January 2023 BEFORE being tried, under the excuse of being an alleged "flight risk"; I was interned in a prison environment while being in a legal state of innocence. I have not been compensated for this, even though the rules say that a person is to be compensated for time spent in unlawful deprivation of liberty (no one is compensated as a result of the "flight risk" loophole, I am told). On 1 April 2018 new European rules allegedly strengthening the guarantee that anyone suspected or accused in criminal proceedings is innocent until proven guilty came into effect; but Sweden ignores these rules by abusing the "flight risk" loophole its Justice Ministry concocted in 2019.

It takes gall for Swedish government political flacks at the Regeringskansliet to cite EU council resolutions sanctioning Nicaragua, when EU rules regarding presumption of innocence are systematically violated in the Swedish court system, which is rigged against migrant defendants.  

As it concerns charges of  "repression of the press" and "use of anti-terrorist laws to suppress dissent" in Nicaragua; I pointed out elsewhere in this weblog about Sweden, that: Legislation has been introduced by the Swedish Parliament in recent years that not only restricts freedom of expression in Sweden (journalists are penalized for writing against Swedish State interests), but also gives more powers to the state's repressive arm (Police), as well as toughens the punishment for those who in one way or another do not accept the state's use of violence for repressive purposes. These laws introduce the dubious concept of "blue light sabotage". Anyone in Sweden who interferes with the police's general surveillance activities directed against individual persons in connection with a political demonstration or strike action can be convicted of "blue light sabotage". In effect civil disobedience is made illegal. The penal code does not allow for fines in cases of "blue light sabotage"; instead for those who are suspected of seriously hindering the police's repressive or surveillance operations, a prison sentence of a maximum of four years awaits, and if the crime is judged to be serious (at the whim of the Police, of course), the penalty can be at least eighteen years.

The Swedish Security Police (Säkerhetspolisen) enforces a system of surveillance and repression of persons deemed a "threat" to the security of the Swedish State or the interests of the Swedish State. Historically, the radical left has been a constant target for repression and other abuses for its perceived "lack of loyalty" to the Swedish political-economy. Persons are arbitrarily declared "threats to security" at the whim of the Säkerhetspolisen without basis in any type of objective and impartial procedural evidentiary process. In April 2023, the Swedish government increased the budget for the security police (Säkerhetspolisen or SÄPO); which also functions as the political police of the Swedish State, thus increasing the scope and intensity of potential repression against those deemed "disloyal" or "security threats" at the subjective whim of Säkerhetspolisen operatives.

About demonstrations "being brutally suppressed" by security forces in Nicaragua, the Swedish State is hardly in a position to pontificate: 

Amnesty International reports that: "In October (2022), the District Court of Solna convicted 12 climate activists, who had carried out an act of civil disobedience, of sabotage. This harsh charge raised concerns regarding the proportionality of restrictions on the right to freedom of assembly as similar earlier acts had been met with less serious charges."

In 2013, Swedish police raided and arrested persons in more than a dozen addresses in the cities of Eskilstuna and Stockholm as part of "Project Eskil", a Swedish Police effort to harass the revolutionary Left. The harassment tactics of "Project Eskil" were similar to those deployed by the FBI's COUNTERINTELPRO program in the 1960s and 1970s against the radical left in the United States. Several people connected with the revolutionary left organization Revolutionära Fronten were arrested. I was an active supporter of Revolutionära Fronten in 2011-13. I was not a member, but I supported the work of its activists. In Swedish media and political commentary, Revolutionära Fronten was labelled a "gang of left-wing hooligans" and this campaign of systematic character assassination served as a pretext for police harassment of this political group.

As it concerns charges of "irregularities and arbitrariness in detention and judicial proceedings"; I have pointed out elsewhere in this weblog that: Swedish police and security guards are repressive and abusive towards people of migrant backgrounds on a daily basis in Stockholm, Göteborg and Malmö (where large communities of persons with migrant backgrounds reside). Case in point was the REVA program instituted in 2013 to hunt down and catch undocumented persons in the Stockholm Metro (Tunnelbanan) and in the Malmö metropolitan area. Persons where stopped, searched and questioned in public at random by Swedish Police "because they looked immigrant" on the basis of overt racial profiling. These racist abuses of immigrant persons by Swedish Police where documented by the activist group Aktion mot Deportation at the time. Furthermore, the human right to presumption of innocence (which is allegedly guaranteed by European Union conventions binding on Sweden), is systematically violated in context of prosecutions.

In 2023, under the pretext that there exists an "immigrant crime wave" (in itself an overt racist generalization promoted in the Swedish State and private fake "free press" media); there is the systematic violation and negation of presumption of innocence for persons with migrant backgrounds in the Swedish court system through the systematic abuse of the "flight risk" loophole by prosecutors and Police. Migrants (especially those of an African and/or Arabic background), are regularly harassed, arrested, imprisoned and sentenced on arbitrary grounds by private security guards, Police, prosecutors, and courts in Sweden. The evidence is in the overpopulated Swedish prisons, jails and detention centers which are filled with inmates of migrant backgrounds (mostly Arabic / Middle Eastern). 

The expression of radical and fundamental oppositional criticism against racist immigration laws, xenophobic practices and repressive Police abuses against persons of an immigrant background are systematically filtered out of the Swedish "free press" State and establishment media.

References: 

https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/utrikes--och-sakerhetspolitik/sanktioner/sanktioner-mot-nicaragua/ (write up deleted from website) ***Read Backup Copy: HERE 

"Steg för steg går vi mot en allt mer repressiv stat." https://proletaren.se/artikel/varning-polisstat

https://riktpunkt.nu/2023/04/repressionen-okar-mer-pengar-till-sakerhetspolisen/

https://www.socialisterna.org/polisskotten-dodar-aven-i-sverige/

Aljazeera News report from 2018: Social media and research: Swedes tackle police racism

https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/europe-and-central-asia/sweden/report-sweden/

postscript: 

In a comment posted in context of a discussion on the recent DISCORDGATE scandal at the World Socialist Website I wrote that: "Journalism" and "the free press" are euphemisms for propaganda that services capitalism and Western military aggression. When New York Times editor Bill Keller stated: “Freedom of the press includes freedom not to publish, and that is a freedom we exercise with some regularity," he was being honest about how propaganda works in the West, it does so by omission. They crop the picture. When you crop the picture, you tell a lie. This method of propaganda by omission is contextualized by what Noam Chomsky once stated: "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum...." Western propaganda crops the picture, simplifies the narrative and limits the scope of discussion. They call this "freedom of the press". One could also apply the maxim of Joseph Goebbels to supplement the statement by Bill Keller: "A lie told once remains a lie, a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth..." If you repeat the cropped and simplified narrative over and over again it becomes "truth". The New York Times and Pravda mirrored each other during the cold war in this way.

The Swedish corporate and State establishment media are hardly representative of a "free press", not unlike other media actors in Western countries who entitle themselves to judge others on Human Rights while they themselves violate them. 

Swedish Police tried to pressure Colombia to say that I am one of their citizens.

 THE ANATOMY OF REFOULEMENT. 

This is the modus operandi of Swedish Border Police when they want to orchestrate the deportation or refoulement of a person to a country they are not from. They try to pressure the country in question to say the person is one of their nationals. Manufacturing "facts" is one way Swedish Police get around not having  evidence. In context of their fraudulent inquiry, Swedish Police also insinuated in context of the inquiry that I was possibly involved in "organized crime" (!)...a subset of the ongoing effort to vilify and defame me. 

The effort to paint me as an "organized gangster" failed. Colombia replied that I was neither one of their citizens nor involved in any type of organized criminal activity in their country. 

Previously n 2012 they tried to associate me with criminal activity in Argentina. Recently in 2023 they tried to associate me with criminal activity in Mexico. 

It seems I have been subjected to the "Kurdish Treatment"... 

See:

https://crd.org/2022/12/21/sweden-must-respect-human-rights-in-connection-with-deportations-to-turkey/